|
Post by nutsberryfarm ⛑ on Apr 9, 2018 13:35:23 GMT
wtkr.com/2018/04/08/usps-releases-annual-dog-attack-city-rankings-for-2017/ BALTIMORE, M.D. – The United States Postal Service released its city rankings of dog attacks involving postal workers.
The list reflects the top 30 cities where the 6,244 dog attacks involving postal workers in 2017 happened, which had Houston, Texas, Los Angeles, California and St. Louis, Missouri, ranked as its top three cities. The total number of attacks is 500 fewer then 2016.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2018 15:05:32 GMT
If you ask me, they have no business living amongst us. Vile, useless beasts! Mailmen, not dogs.
|
|
|
Post by nutsberryfarm ⛑ on Apr 9, 2018 16:00:12 GMT
If you ask me, they have no business living amongst us. Vile, useless beasts! Mailmen, not dogs. what about ups men??!
|
|
|
Post by pizzabagel on Apr 9, 2018 16:06:29 GMT
The list reflects the top 30 cities where the 6,244 dog attacks involving postal workers in 2017 happened, which had Houston, Texas, Los Angeles, California and St. Louis, Missouri, ranked as its top three cities. The total number of attacks is 500 fewer then 2016.
Have you been to Houston? It's like a leper colony dog kennel down there.
------------------------------
“We’re encouraged by the decrease in dog attacks,” said U.S. Postal Service Safety Director Linda DeCarlo in San Diego, where postal employees suffered 46 attacks — the fifth ranked city in 2017. “The totals are still too high, but we’re confident that with continuing education and dog bite prevention training, along with advancing technology, we can keep more people safe and keep attacks trending downward.”
Drones?
------------------------------
No cities from Virginia made the list, and Charlotte was the only city in North Carolina to be on it.
Those states aren't trying hard enough.
|
|
|
Post by 📬🚑📭 on Apr 9, 2018 19:31:41 GMT
Not a very scientific poll. Only including the total number of attacks naturally puts the bigger cities on top. Shouldn't it be the ratio of dog attacks to number of pieces of mail delivered to street addresses?
|
|
|
Post by jcssupertape on Apr 9, 2018 21:03:24 GMT
wtkr.com/2018/04/08/usps-releases-annual-dog-attack-city-rankings-for-2017/ BALTIMORE, M.D. – The United States Postal Service released its city rankings of dog attacks involving postal workers.
The list reflects the top 30 cities where the 6,244 dog attacks involving postal workers in 2017 happened, which had Houston, Texas, Los Angeles, California and St. Louis, Missouri, ranked as its top three cities. The total number of attacks is 500 fewer then 2016. No shot... Dog bite
|
|
|
Post by 📬🚑📭 on Apr 9, 2018 22:22:32 GMT
...No cities from Virginia made the list, and Charlotte was the only city in North Carolina to be on it.Those states aren't trying hard enough. New York state isn't trying hard enough either. Of course NYC is fragmented into a lot of P.O.'s, but still you would expect more than just Rochester out of thirty on the list.
|
|
|
Post by pizzabagel on Apr 9, 2018 22:58:58 GMT
...No cities from Virginia made the list, and Charlotte was the only city in North Carolina to be on it.Those states aren't trying hard enough. New York state isn't trying hard enough either. Of course NYC is fragmented into a lot of P.O.'s, but still you would expect more than just Rochester out of thirty on the list. I'm gonna buy me a vicious dog, 'cause I need to attack my mail carrier now.
|
|
|
Post by 📬🚑📭 on Apr 9, 2018 23:44:28 GMT
New York state isn't trying hard enough either. Of course NYC is fragmented into a lot of P.O.'s, but still you would expect more than just Rochester out of thirty on the list. I'm gonna buy me a vicious dog, 'cause I need to attack my mail carrier now. You can still have a dog in NYC? I thought maybe De Blasio had outlawed them or at least raised the licensing fees through the roof.
|
|
|
Post by pizzabagel on Apr 10, 2018 0:04:07 GMT
I'm gonna buy me a vicious dog, 'cause I need to attack my mail carrier now. You can still have a dog in NYC? I thought maybe De Blasio had outlawed them or at least raised the licensing fees through the roof. De Blasio hasn't outlawed pooches, and as far as I can tell he hasn't priced licenses out of reach of the hoi polloi. (Hoi polloi. Is that a new breed of dog?)
|
|